LogoLogo
  • Usdfi: What is a Stablecoin?
  • Overview Usdfi
  • Staked USDfi
  • Roadmap
  • Team
  • Official Contacts
  • Risk
  • USDfi Compared to Other Stablecoins
Powered by GitBook
On this page

USDfi Compared to Other Stablecoins

1. USDfi vs LUSD (Liquity)

LUSD: An overcollateralized stablecoin backed by ETH, with high volatility risk and capital inefficiencies. USDfi: Collateralized 1:1 with liquid assets and gold using carry arbitrage operations; more resilient to market fluctuations.


2. USDfi vs LYBRA

LYBRA: Yield-bearing stablecoin pegged to stETH, exposed to risks from liquid staking derivatives. USDfi: Uses real assets and carry arbitrage for stable, sustainable yields—without relying on staking derivatives.


3. USDfi vs UXD

UXD: Algorithmic stablecoin with delta-neutral hedging, vulnerable to sudden liquidations and inefficiencies during volatile events. USDfi: Uses gold futures hedging and tangible reserves, avoiding liquidation risks.


4. USDfi vs DAI

DAI: Overcollateralized with volatile assets and partially dependent on USDC. USDfi: Backed 1:1 with selected stablecoins and hedged gold—no over-collateralization required, enabling a more efficient structure.


5. USDfi vs RAI

RAI: Non-pegged stablecoin with fluctuating price and automated control mechanisms. USDfi: Clearly pegged to 1 USD, with reserve interventions and self-arbitrage mechanisms to maintain parity.


6. USDfi vs TERRA (UST)

TERRA/UST: Algorithmic stablecoin that collapsed due to unsustainable mechanisms and lack of real reserves. USDfi: Backed by tangible reserves, uses carry arbitrage, and avoids pure algorithmic reliance.


7. USDfi vs USDC

USDC: Centralized stablecoin, subject to government oversight and potential freezes. USDfi: Fully decentralized, trustless, censorship-resistant, and backed by verifiable on-chain reserves.


8. USDfi vs FRAX

FRAX: Semi-algorithmic stablecoin, vulnerable to instability cycles and constant tuning. USDfi: Simple model, real assets, sustainable earnings, and no external intervention needed.


9. USDfi vs ETHENA (USDe)

ETHENA: Backed by delta-neutral strategies on ETH derivatives; innovative but still exposed to crypto volatility and exchange-related risks. USDfi: Integrates physical gold, liquid stablecoins, and hedging with futures—less exposed to crypto volatility, more tied to regulated markets (gold). Comparison Table

Protocol
Collateral
Peg
Decentralization
Yield
Main Risk

LUSD

Overcollateralized ETH

1 USD

High

None

ETH volatility, high capital consumption

LYBRA

stETH

1 USD

Medium

Variable

Exposure to staking derivatives

UXD

Delta-neutral derivatives

1 USD

Medium

Variable

Liquidations in volatile markets

DAI

Multiple collateral

1 USD

Medium-High

Limited

Partial dependency on USDC

RAI

ETH

Floating

High

Variable

Unstable peg, hard to understand

TERRA

Algorithmic

Collapsed

High (former)

None

Algorithmic collapse

USDC

USD fiat

1 USD

Centralized

None

Fund freezing, regulatory risk

FRAX

Semi-algorithmic

1 USD

Medium

Variable

Instability cycles, constant mechanism tuning

ETHENA

Crypto derivatives

1 USD

Medium

High

ETH volatility, exchange-related risks

USDfi

Physical gold, stablecoins

1 USD

Full

Stable

Tech and custodian risk

Conclusion

USDfi isn’t just another stablecoin: it represents the synthesis of what has worked in previous projects—without inheriting their weaknesses. With real-world assets, sophisticated arbitrage mechanisms, and a transparent structure, USDfi is the ideal choice for conscious crypto users seeking stability, sustainable yield, and maximum on-chain freedom.

PreviousRisk

Last updated 2 months ago